CREATION vs. Evolution

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Genesis 1:1 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. Hebrews 11:3 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. Genesis 1:31 After His 6 days of Creation- And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. Genesis 2:2,3 As He wrote with His own finger in the 4th Commandment - Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work,..... For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. Exodus 20:8-11 The threat to Christianity is not Darwinian cross-species evolutionary theory, but rather "christians" who claim to believe in evolution. (through "intelligent design", "theistic evolution" or "progressive evolution"). - Look at what sin has done to the Creation - For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now. Romans 8:22 Since sin enterd the world through mankind, YOU CAN NOT POINT BELOW THE FEET OF SOMEONE AND TELL THEM THAT THE FOSSIL RECORD CAME BEFORE MAN. FOR THE FOSSIL RECORD CONTAINS SIGNS OF SIN, (pain, suffering and death). As the first Adam failed and tasted the forbbiden fruit of sin, the "Second Adam" came and succeeded, and didn't taste of the forbidden fruit of sin. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 1 Corinthians 15:22 Two scientific points that refute evolution- 1) Theory of Ireducible Complexity-- That something that is so complex, in order for it to function, could have not evolved over eons of time gradually. Good example is blood clotting. There are over 100 processes that take place in a specific order for your blood to clot. If one is missing, or out-of-whack, it doesn't clot. In other words, you could not achieve that gradually. For the "first" creature with blood to evolve it would have to have the whole system to function the first time correctly, or it would bleed to death at the first cut. That defies "gradual" evolution. That would require massive whole leaps in evolution, which evolutionists themselves deny could happen. Another example would be eyes, etc. 2) Theory of Coherence -- You would have to assume, in the rugged terraine of gradual, random use of natural selection, that there would be no missing steps. That, stastically, would be impossible. It is akin to having an ape type and over eons of time he might produce the full acurate chapter of a book, or over time, randomly puching away at the keys produce at some point every page that exists on myspace by chance. As thou knowest not what is the way of the spirit, nor how the bones do grow in the womb of her that is with child: even so thou knowest not the works of God who maketh all. Ecclesiastes 11:5 Think of CREATION as a line that extends since the begining, for each created kind, turing churning out different shapes, sizes and colors through the process of natural selection. But a dog is still a dog, it doesn't change over time into a racoon. That is the beauty of natural selection in the web of Creation. Some questions for evolutionists: 1) Which evolved first? An infant or an adult? 2) When the first creature evolve that needed the nutrients that plants pull from the earth, how did the DNA of plants get together and decide to write codes to grow roots to pull out those nutrients for the other "evolving creatures" who needed it? 3) When did the first "evolving creatures" evolve from cell division to gender reproduction? How did they simoultaneously write two codes, a male and a female code? At some point they would have too. This takes us back to the points made by coherence and irreducible complexity. For the first "female creature" to evolve would have to be able to successfully bear offsrping the first time, everything would have to work or that line of evolution would die off with it. Those require massive leaps in evolution. Then of course the dating techniques are questionable. Many of them don't match. For example, a 50 year old eruption at Mt. Ngauruhoe, in New Zealand, yielded dates of 133 million years old! C-14 carbon dating is only accurate for about 5,000 years. Then there is DNA. Rewinding the Mt DNA clock back, scientists tell us we all come from the same woman, they mockingly call the first "Eve". Russian scientists in 1999 rewound the Mt DNA for humans back, with no monkey calibration rates, and came up with about 6,000 years. The other scientists use different monkey estimated rates mixed with human DNA. But who knows what any of the ACTUAL calibration rates are. For we know many animals can produce multiple litters, in a year, and reproduce sooner than humans. Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.Have the gates of death been opened unto thee? or hast thou seen the doors of the shadow of death? Where is the way where light dwelleth? and as for darkness, where is the place thereof, By what way is the light parted, which scattereth the east wind upon the earth? Job 38:1,3,4,17,24 This is where we say Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer thee? I will lay mine hand upon my mouth. Job 40:4